|
|
|
Administrator 67 posts
Registered: Jan 2007
Administrator 2058 posts
Registered: Jan 2006
Member 80 posts
Registered: Mar 2007
Nice stuff, just made my first bets.
Member 1102 posts
Registered: Jan 2006
Member 247 posts
Registered: Jan 2006
awesome !
Member 637 posts
Registered: Jan 2006
this is utterly poundsome http://slip.4.pl/ - unblocking myspace facebook firewall
Member 793 posts
Registered: Feb 2006
hey hey, my my. what an excellent idea. congrats to your think-tank, XantoM.
Member 198 posts
Registered: Oct 2006
quoting 4chan, i see win
Member 258 posts
Registered: Feb 2006
Administrator 2058 posts
Registered: Jan 2006
perhaps more betting modes should be added, but i bet you already thought of that some suggestions more or less than 200.5 frags 1 X 0 system (for games that can tie) worst efficiency (requires list of participants in game) - if the lists given aren't correct, the bets would be nullified best efficiency (requires list of participants in game) - if the lists given aren't correct, the bets would be nullified most quads (1 X 0) most pents (1 X 0) would be more fun to bet on stuff like this
Administrator 67 posts
Registered: Jan 2007
Empezar :> That can already be done. When adding a game, you select any number of options. You just will have to change the title. IE Slackers vs KOFF (frags) [ ] > 200 [ ] < 200 Same with the other stuff. I think I'll have to make bet groups, else the upcoming game list will be too crowded. I'll keep the Goldrush 1.0 featurelist and wishlist in the bottom of the official newspost. Keep ideas coming!
Administrator 2058 posts
Registered: Jan 2006
what happens if there's 200 frags ;P
Member 355 posts
Registered: Jun 2006
what happens if there's 200 frags ;P Tie. It's like spreads in sports. Many go like .5 points to avoid any possibility of a draw. I recommend the 200 is change to like 200.5 or 199.5
Administrator 2058 posts
Registered: Jan 2006
odds of exactly 200 frags should be extremely high in comparison to >200 and <200 in that case
Administrator 2058 posts
Registered: Jan 2006
--- bug #1 ---
Biggest loss: $100
my biggest loss is $25
my biggest bet however, is $100
--- suggestion #1 ---
make the leaderboards show WINNINGS instead of BALANCE
the good betters won't have their money laying around doing nothing, just to be up there on the leaders board
--- suggestion #2 ---
I understand you can't add good odds on all games, which is why you should let the players act as bookies!
use the system they have on betfair
I want to give 4 odds on SR vs SD 2-0, I'm gonna match $100 here some guy bets $100, and if it turns out, he wins $100x4 = $400, but if the result is ANYTHING other than 2-0, I win $100
Administrator 67 posts
Registered: Jan 2007
bug #1 - fixed suggestion #1 - Cash is still king, but im gonna change successfull bets are listed suggestion #2 - Ill take it into consideration :>
Administrator 2058 posts
Registered: Jan 2006
you should change this while viewing other people's user info:
Clan MalFunction vs Death Dealers 1.4 2-0, $100
into
Clan MalFunction vs Death Dealers $100
there's no need to let people know what people are betting on right now, let them know AFTER the game!
otherwise, people can just imitate #1 on the leaderboard!
Administrator 2058 posts
Registered: Jan 2006
Potential win: $2033 if i bet on all outcomes of a game, my potential win can't be that EVERY outcome goes through, right? potential win should be the BEST possible outcome, right?
Member 198 posts
Registered: Oct 2006
Lo, i wrote down some suggestions on the qwdrama.com comments site. Some of them are here already, some not, hth.
Administrator 67 posts
Registered: Jan 2007
Member 59 posts
Registered: Mar 2006
Cool!
Please add the FTK/KTK tourneys if you can. Like one day before they start for example.
Administrator 67 posts
Registered: Jan 2007
I will try to, just let me know and i'll any game.
/msg XantoM @ irc .. or you can send a message to any of the other admins in #qwdrama.
Member 88 posts
Registered: Oct 2006
I liked the beta version better to be honest. Things I am missing: - You removed the option of betting multiple times on the same game? And also to increase the amount bet on a game? Or am i just overlooking something? - Also, before you got an overview of possible wins in your profile, i think. - and there is no way to check who voted on what option? Not saying all that was really needed, but i rather liked it like that
Administrator 2058 posts
Registered: Jan 2006
you can raise your own odds by betting multiple time on same game, so i understand that move
Member 88 posts
Registered: Oct 2006
Yeah, sure. But then just add the 2 amounts together and let them count for one bet?
Not sure if you could have any advantage in odds by placing bets on different options. I guess not, since overall the odds would become more equal like that.
The system can very much be gamed anyway if you have a number of people working together since small bets count the same as large bets towards the odds, no? Unless odds are also weighed for the size of the bet?
Oh well; I don't necesseraly want it to get very complicated or professional or 'safe' or whatever. It's fun enough as it is.
Member 705 posts
Registered: Feb 2006
ktk was a pain in the ass to maintain at goldrush, so many players not showing up etc. but we will see what we can do
Administrator 2058 posts
Registered: Jan 2006
if there are 3 options to bet on, and each of them raises the other options' odds no matter how much you bet, then you can bet like this:
1 $500 X $10 2 $10
and get more out of that $500 bet than you would had you only bet on 1.
Member 1435 posts
Registered: Jan 2006
but you'll lose $20
Administrator 2058 posts
Registered: Jan 2006
yes, lose $20 in order to make $100 extra on that $500, that seems like it's worth it to me.
how about a 1-2 minute "regret" function? I just misread a game and bet $1900 on the wrong score, would be nice if that was regrettable during the first minute, cause it will suck having to wait a month for a refill.
Member 518 posts
Registered: Jan 2006
everyone who is broke gets $50 every sunday, but that regret thing should be a nice option
|
|
|
|