Oh, OK, so you just don't like giving credit where credit is due. Fair enough.


Do you think you contributed anything worthwhile to the thread?

Considering the fact that you obviously have a grudge towards certain developers, do you think you're eligble for a warning?

Considering the fact that you obviously have a conflict of interest and that you have previously abused your moderator privileges to attempt to bully me, do you really think that threatening me is a wise move?

As an administrator of the board, I gave you a warning not to continue. Did you think you could continue to behave the way you do and the staff of qw.nu wouldn't notice it or let it slip? Besides it seems that you are the one "threatening" someone with your last sentence.

For his continuous abusive posting, flaming attempts and breaking the rules, bigfoot gets some time off. Once the ban is lifted, and if the "act" continues, there will be no more warnings before action is taken.

that smooth quake article update was good.

makes things a lot simpler to navigate and go through. gives good explanation regarding setting your fps to a multiple of your refresh rate.

so your fps should be a multiple of your refresh rate? i thought you didnt need to set it that way anymore. anyways

ive just tried using refresh lock, btw that link in smoothquake doesnt work, refresh doesnt exist anymore its now ReForce, need to change that in link. i set in ReForce my hz to 154 (i have a crt)

it seems to have fixed some kind of issue with quake. the strafe pulling and turning circle pulling etc that caused slowness of movement seems to have been completely resolved. not having the

right hz would give this kind of problem? it seems whatever problems ive had with smoothness were to do with the hz i had set and the monitor i was using.. among many other long ago configuration

issues. did hz always have to be relative to fps?

why wouldnt the hz reset in qw unless using reforce... it seems to have made a difference recently changing it to 150hz but now when setting 154 in reforce as opposed to not using reforce and setting 154 in qw it didnt have the same affect?? it was like qw was picking up my windows resolution or something. what the hell

the smoothness is massively noticeable when using reforce 154 hz as opposed to qw 154 hz... unless qw is not registering the 154hz and is running something else..

ive removed reforce settings and tested and retested and it is absolutely noticeable. so what is going on here...



btw: that video on how to change your mouse mouse hz/usb polling rate to 500 or 1000 in windows vista/7 x64 if setpoint doesnt work for you. I made!!
someone had uploaded it to youtube from some other site i uploaded it to
i have a higher quality video of it on my hd i can upload somewhere if requested...

can someone advise on some of the above questions regading fps multiple of refresh rate.. refresh lock changing my hz...

please advise...

had similar issue and i am still using powerstrip becouse there is a noticable difference between Hz set with powerstrip and qw as you said...

From: http://www.quakeworld.nu/blogs/436/140/

...and I don't know any good reason not to use cl_earlypackets.

Also need sys_highpriority 1 to maximize whole quake response, including mouse.

Obviously you did think it was a wise move to abuse your administrator privileges. Congratulations on that.

Now, since you seem so butthurt over having your ego deflated and your ugly personality exposed, let me go into a bit more detail.

You took QTV, a piece of software written by Spike, which currently counts sixteen thousand, yes, 16000 lines of code and released it as your own under the name 'Eztv'. No credit given to the author. None. Nada. No credits on the website linked in your signature, no credits in the releases. Really nothing. The website only mentions unrelated people as developers and _you_ as the 'project leader'.

To add insult to injury, after ripping of Spike's code, you decided to rename 'your' project to the name of Spike's project, thus knowingly and willingly creating a nomenclature.

In this thread, you have the gall to complain that a couple of lines of text were unattributed to you, despite that the text wasn't really original. Let me quote you again:


Yet you, by your own words, stole 16000 lines of code and didn't credit the author.

If you are not the biggest hypocrite on this website, I don't know who is.

PS. You never answered my question: Do you think you contributed anything worthwhile to this thread?

Could you perhaps take this in pm?
I mean you wait from 8th of June intil now to continue this?
Could perhaps have phoned or emailed or even go to Finland and visit Renzo in the meantime?

No, keep it in the open! We need some drama *grabs the popcorn* 8)

To be fair, I think both bigfoot and Renzo owe us some post on the original post subject of smoothness. I know both of you know a lot so give us the pro tips! What fps, hz, res, mouse, etc, is important? Is that stupid sensitivity 77.237981237918237 really that big of a deal? Thanks.

just use fodquake and cl_maxfps "whatever you want(in some way related to your monitor refreshrate)". smooth yay!

!phil: like this one? http://www.quakeworld.nu/blogs/436/140/