I know this might be old news to some people. But for those of you that had no clue, you might just be able to lower your ping quite a bit. This is for the ones with ADSL, VDSL, Annex-M, etc. If you're hooked up to a DSLAM at the telestation you should be good to go, I think.
As I've understod it, you ISP sends you data in chopped up packets that are made to avoid any interference when (interleaving) packets get lost on the way due to noise burts, etc. That means you don't have to loose data which is nice, but it takes just a while longer for them to reach you with this method. Yes, that acctually means greater latency. The opposite to interleaving is called fastpath where you try to send it all without any chopped up packets, "just bring it, if I miss one I don't care". That means a lower latency but a risk of loosing signal quality. You could experience packetloss (I still have 0 PL) if you're unlucky. Another sideeffect is that you could loose some bandwith (in my case the upload got a bit worse).
Wikipedia entry about the techniques
I called my ISP (Swedish "Bredbandsbolaget" and asked them to turn off interleaving and let it run in fastpath instead. I'll post some results below, but all in all it was a great success. Download bandwidth stayed the same, upload got worse, but hell I don't care. Latency was approx up to 40% lower with fastpath then with interleaving. I do believe some ISP already run fastpath as default, but some don't, "BBB" sure didn't. It took them 5 minutes to remotely switch and my ping was greatly reduced in an instant.
Hope this might be of some help to others. The customerservice I spoke to called it "pingfilter", so if they don't know what the hell you're talking about they might just use another term for it. I'm no expert but ask questions if you got any. It would be nice to see if others get the same results aswell, and we could get some info on which ISP that can swith or are already running fastpath as default.
As I've understod it, you ISP sends you data in chopped up packets that are made to avoid any interference when (interleaving) packets get lost on the way due to noise burts, etc. That means you don't have to loose data which is nice, but it takes just a while longer for them to reach you with this method. Yes, that acctually means greater latency. The opposite to interleaving is called fastpath where you try to send it all without any chopped up packets, "just bring it, if I miss one I don't care". That means a lower latency but a risk of loosing signal quality. You could experience packetloss (I still have 0 PL) if you're unlucky. Another sideeffect is that you could loose some bandwith (in my case the upload got a bit worse).
Wikipedia entry about the techniques
I called my ISP (Swedish "Bredbandsbolaget" and asked them to turn off interleaving and let it run in fastpath instead. I'll post some results below, but all in all it was a great success. Download bandwidth stayed the same, upload got worse, but hell I don't care. Latency was approx up to 40% lower with fastpath then with interleaving. I do believe some ISP already run fastpath as default, but some don't, "BBB" sure didn't. It took them 5 minutes to remotely switch and my ping was greatly reduced in an instant.
Hope this might be of some help to others. The customerservice I spoke to called it "pingfilter", so if they don't know what the hell you're talking about they might just use another term for it. I'm no expert but ask questions if you got any. It would be nice to see if others get the same results aswell, and we could get some info on which ISP that can swith or are already running fastpath as default.