User panel stuff on forum
  38 posts on 2 pages  First page12Last page
Server Talk
2010-09-28, 13:52
Administrator
1864 posts

Registered:
Feb 2006
If you only have 1 server, then just forward both your connections to it. Then there is no need for lan qwfwds - and you could use full speed on the secondary, promising 2 connections for qw is a bit much anyway
2010-09-28, 14:40
Administrator
1025 posts

Registered:
Apr 2006
Hehe, I think Iäm getting your point. Like:

WAN1 -> ServerNIC1 (set gateway WAN1)
WAN2 -> Router (if port 27500->257XX forward to server) -> ServerNIC2 && other computers

Thats what you mean? If thats the case, only problem is that its a miniITX-board with 1 NIC. I do however have a PCIe 16x on it which could be used for like a PCIe x1 Gigabit-NIC. But then
the problem is that i dont have space for it in the case, nor support for expansion slots :E

And since main purpose would be qwfwd, i wrote earlier that the problem is that either ppl have good ping to me (and my conn bad to servers), or they ping higher to me and my conn pings good to servers..

Well what i meant in last post.. My solution would make it possible to choose incoming connection and outgoing connection from both of my WAN. But your solution would make it possible to choose from 2 incoming connections and only one outgoing. I still don't see how that will make it possible to max load one connection without disturbing anything.
2010-09-28, 15:17
Member
117 posts

Registered:
Jan 2006
I love how you have a choice of 100/100 ISP's especially as that sort of speed is probably 10+ years away in the UK. Oh I'm not jealous at all... honest.
2010-09-28, 17:23
Administrator
1025 posts

Registered:
Apr 2006
@gore: ) I'm sure though your universities have pretty good connections, atleast some of them? Lund is like all about the university and reseach/development around it.

Proxy is up, please give it a try @ fog.mine.nu:30000 . Please post some feedback after you've tried it! Thx
2010-09-28, 17:33
Member
21 posts

Registered:
Feb 2008
Tried against Pangela and Wargamez and got worse ms then with the foppa.dk proxy. Seems telia and perspektiv doesnt match up :p


Edit:

Ping-statistik för 213.185.26.69:
Paket: Skickade = 4, Mottagna = 4, Förlorade = 0 (0 %),
Ungefärlig överföringstid i millisekunder:
Lägsta = 26 ms, Högsta = 27 ms, Medel = 26 ms

24mbit telia connection

//Exxus
2010-09-28, 17:47
Administrator
1025 posts

Registered:
Apr 2006
...
2011-01-28, 14:43
Administrator
1025 posts

Registered:
Apr 2006
Allright, good ()news:

I've found some old stuff in a box, so I put together a new server (instead of running stuff on my atom htpc as i do now).

It will be running on its own Bahnhof 100/100 connection. It will soon host several ports and proxy.
Hostname isn't decided fully yet, so I will come back like tomorrow with info on that.

Thoughts/ideas? Particular maps you want etc? (I have the huge mappack dated 2007 or something)

(And yeah, the connection is updated since last time.. They performed a big upgrade some month ago, hopefully it lowered pings etc. More on that when they are up!)
2011-01-28, 15:04
Administrator
334 posts

Registered:
Jan 2006
yeah I got about 4000 maps you can put on =)
ready!
  38 posts on 2 pages  First page12Last page