Member
1 post
Registered:
Nov 2006
ezquake doesn't start due to following error:
ezquake-gl.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
Error signature
AppName: ezquake-gl.exe AppVer: 0.0.0.0 ModName: ezquake-gl.exe
ModVer: 0.0.0.0 Offset: 0016d2ce
System: AMD Athlon 64 3500+ / Epox EP-MF4-Ultra-3 / Gigabyte GV-NX76G256D-RH GF 7600GS 256 MB / 2x512 MB
OS: winxp corporate sp2
Please, help!
Member
357 posts
Registered:
Mar 2006
Member
47 posts
Registered:
Jan 2006
Compiling
static linking, you don't need any addition libraries to run all Linux and Windows builds (disconnect, t3st), all libraries downloadable from our web for compiling
Uhm...
I get:
./ezquake-gl.glx: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by ./ezquake-gl.glx)
and:
ldd ezquake-gl.glx
./ezquake-gl.glx: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by ./ezquake-gl.glx)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7dbc000)
where:
/lib/tls/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.3.6.so
is the newest libc version availible for debian (unstable)
Member
47 posts
Registered:
Jan 2006
Ah, I lied, after installing libc6-i686_2.5-0exp3_i386.deb for debian (experimental ;O) it works.
Member
151 posts
Registered:
Jan 2006
well yes. ezQuake reqies GLIBC 2.4
probably for release 2.5 will be a MUST
kill me now and burn my soul
Member
47 posts
Registered:
Jan 2006
well yes. ezQuake reqies GLIBC 2.4
probably for release 2.5 will be a MUST
Is 2.5 really a absolute must? So far I've only had problems with 2.5. Qizmo+2.5=loads of whine sometimes, possible even craches, I must test this more, However most of my problems is debian-related due to 2.5 beeing experimental and it makes me wonder if this new ezQuake is worth it.
News