User panel stuff on forum
  9 posts on 1 page  1
Client Talk
2008-12-22, 13:52
Member
8 posts

Registered:
Nov 2008
Hi,

I'm looking for a GPL (or compatible) .pak distribution which can be included in the Debian package of ezQuake.
www.vanheusden.com
2008-12-22, 14:40
Member
705 posts

Registered:
Feb 2006
http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines
also would inclusion in non-free be a secondary goal?
2008-12-22, 15:04
Member
364 posts

Registered:
Oct 2006
Currently there is no complete free pak for Quake I that doesn't suck. You can, however, include a shell script which will download the shareware distribution and extract pak0.pak from it, like nQuake does: http://nquake.com/download_linux.html
2008-12-22, 17:56
Administrator
2059 posts

Registered:
Jan 2006
Tonik wrote:
Currently there is no complete free pak for Quake I that doesn't suck.

Are there completely free paks that do suck? Maybe they can be improved so they reach a non-suckage-state?
www.facebook.com/QuakeWorld
2008-12-22, 18:23
Member
364 posts

Registered:
Oct 2006
There's OpenQuartz and it's pathetic
2008-12-22, 18:26
Member
364 posts

Registered:
Oct 2006
Well, I guess you could find quality (and even reasonably faithful) graphics and models for just about anything but player.mdl and monsters.
2008-12-23, 02:46
Administrator
2058 posts

Registered:
Jan 2006
Tonik wrote:
Well, I guess you could find quality (and even reasonably faithful) graphics and models for just about anything but player.mdl and monsters.

But most of those aren't GPL.
2008-12-23, 10:28
Member
1435 posts

Registered:
Jan 2006
empezar wrote:
But most of those aren't GPL.

What makes you think this is any sort of problem?

Michael Fötsch from Free Software Foundation wrote:
The license for the software does not generally affect the music and artwork at all.
link

In this particular case there is a different restriction:
All the works must be under lincenses which are Debian-compatible. What this means is explained under the link ruskie pasted here. It defines general rules which the licenses of all the data must satisfy. That is not necessarily GPL, that is not even necessarily GPL-compatible.
2008-12-23, 11:06
Member
347 posts

Registered:
Feb 2006
Exactly. And work like the Quake Retexturing Project does seem to have a license that is Debian compatible. From what I can see their license looks a lot like the MIT license or the Creative Commons 3.0 BY-SA.
  9 posts on 1 page  1